No. 21-6996

Robert Stivers v. Illinois

Lower Court: Illinois
Docketed: 2022-01-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 5th-amendment civil-rights coerced-confession confession-admissibility constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process interrogation-procedure police-interrogation right-to-silence
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw
Latest Conference: 2022-03-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the police violated a suspect's constitutional rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments when they ignored clear and unambiguous invocations of the right to remain silent and used promises of leniency to extract a confession that was involuntary, unreliable, and violated the suspect's constitutional rights

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : Questions Resewteol Ts a suspects Constitution Amencbments Vas wel! as, XIV cights , VioloteX whes a clear and usambjguous ivocaties to teraid sileot is ignoret ° Adotowaly Would overs oO specihic banelits ralofeot? to the case, ane to what extesst police may use Promises an hes to extract a Lomessions Stor a suspect beYore cenderinyg it WSVolupta ty, uneeliable, avet vio lating thei Copstitection Ameddme sts Vias well | as, XV rights ° erties fetitioner , pro se! | Probect Stivers, Lboc # Y28 1697, Mepacd Correctional Coster, PO. Box 1000 Mesaccl, Tl 62257 For esporclent Arthory Wills: | Tilisois HF orney Geneva! Awame Raoul 500 8, Secopel ar Spring iele/ TLL 6270l Rior Opiwions Avot Orclers : Probert Stivers was convictect of aggravated! battery apo Reet Hegree mucdec; Cheistiae Courty , Zihinsois, asé PO, /6-¢F-4¢2 Direct Appeal, aemedt, Feople v. Stivers, 20a) EL App (ST )/30339-U leave 46 Aye! +o The Tilisols Supreme Couct, Depieoh, 127377 . | Table OF Corteats fage Juciscliction Constitutional Are! Statutory frovision’s Slatemest OF the (se 2 fieosons For Gearrtinsg “the Wert is Copelusiop 20 Liolex To Appesehces Lihiwois Appellate Couct otecisions, Fi+h District. Appepralix A — Lilivois Supreme Court letter iSooming Petlower was cleric Sor leave to Appeal. Hpperds & . Basis OF Juciscliction) See hing Upitet Stetes Supreme Court review of the TH pois Appellate Court, BLE District adSiemation) of Ri tiowers Convictiopd, The jucisclictiogs ok this Court is iNVobe poh 28US8.C. § 25712) Copstitutiosa] Provisions Ast Statutes Ubited States Copstituctiop, Amesolmest Vi ancl, XV THlivois Coole pucsviaot to F2STLES SJIS74 (West 2ole) Staterneot OF facts ober + Stivers wes Charged! with aggcavetect battery of a child updet the age of 13, aol Sirsto€gree PUL HAZY, Sollowiag the heath oF his four-month clef Sox), CL. (6.38; 227, 8.98). Stivers was CopvicteXL oy both courts Following 2 jury trial Qnol sestences’ to 50 years ip) Prison. (0.644 -67, 70s), Defewse Motion to Suppress Statements Defense counse/ Pleol a motios to Supp Tess statemests ggg that Stivers hacl isvoked his cight to silence, ave that law ° Cssorcenvest usa’ ofhers of lepiescy to extract @ copiessior, CC.139-Y8). The trial court Soumol that Stivecs madla phree potestia/ iNVocatioss o} his Cight +o temas Sileat the Gest wher) Stivers Salcl CasT be olone Answering gestions because yous eee asking me the same guestions. “the seconed came Jedec, wher Stivees Sail, "Cows LT be Hope answering questions Now, “anol Specia/ Agerst Johns Yaccl tésponadect, “No,” the last came pear the enol of the insterrogetion’, wWhed Stivers ashect! agains iS he coulod he cbpe ansilering questions, (C,3/2-/2). | the court Sous that the seconet statement was ar Wvacaligd or the cight to silesce that Agent Yarol oli! Sot scrupulously hones, thes, everything alter this poction) 0) the victo, inclucting Stivers” alemonstratiog) with a lf as to how he squeeze anol shook, Cb, Were suppresseol (C.3/2-18), the previous statemeots, iv which Stivers athpouwlecbe! as anol shaking C.L., wece sti} admitted he court maivtaivect that Agent York bol ot make ANY promises of lewiercy. (C. 312-77), a States Motions to Admit Prior Rod Acts the State Sought to admit NUMECOUS PTior bad acts allegeotly Commi ttet by Stivers, Usoler 725 ILCS F/i1s74 C2), which allows evi olepsce of other otbeuses of homestic violence. (C.504), Delesse counse/ objected, arguing that Hone of the ivc/olents qualities” as domestic violesce, apa thet pone of the ipcileots were similac to the allegations against Stivers, that he steuch ane shook CL. | CP), 576-80) The court ultimately allowec’ Your of the iweite tS. Delewse Motion to Reclucte Text Messages Pelweer Stivers ancl filey Stivers was is the carly stages of a romantic telationshiy with 1G-yeat-olel brat hyo Riley. The court allowed the Stete to use Facebook meSS Ag eS betueer SHvers avi Riley From several days beSore CL wes hospitalized to the

Docket Entries

2022-03-07
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/4/2022.
2022-02-16
Waiver of right of respondent Illinois to respond filed.
2022-01-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 28, 2022)

Attorneys

Illinois
Katherine Marie DoerschOffice of the Illinois Attorney General, Respondent
Robert Stivers
Robert Stivers — Petitioner