No. 21-7000

Dominic Dean Adams v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-01-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review conviction conviction-review court-of-appeals criminal-procedure due-process judicial-procedure legal-error sentencing standard-of-review
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2022-03-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the court of appeals err in affirming Mr. Adams' conviction?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Did the court of appeals err in affirming Mr. Adams’ conviction? --prefix-

Docket Entries

2022-03-07
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/4/2022.
2022-02-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main Document
2022-01-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 28, 2022)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Dominic Adams
Devin Jai Burstein — Warren & Burstein, Petitioner
Devin Jai Burstein — Warren & Burstein, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent