No. 21-7005

Adam M. DeVore v. Kenneth Black, Warden

Lower Court: Ohio
Docketed: 2022-01-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure criminal-indictment due-process fourteenth-amendment jurisdiction jurisdictional-change location-modification ohio-supreme-court venue
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2022-04-14 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the location of an alleged offense can be changed post-appeal and whether such a change violates due process

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED If an indictment alleges an offense occurring at the county of Ashland “in the State of Ohio, can jurisdiction over the offense be lost if the location of the offense is changed post-appeal to "different locations." i.e., could the offense have been committed within Ohio if the location is "diff; erent"? And does such a change violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment? And whether all.-Ohioans ‘will be denied their Fourteenth Amendment rights when the Ohio Supreme Court failed to address the Court of Appeals erroneous dismissal on R.C.2969.25 grounds turning an application into a civil action against the State? , . : | . |

Docket Entries

2022-04-18
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-03-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2022.
2022-03-17
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-02-28
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/25/2022.
2022-02-03
Waiver of right of respondent Kenneth Black to respond filed.
2022-01-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 28, 2022)

Attorneys

Adam M. DeVore
Adam DeVore — Petitioner
Kenneth Black
Benjamin Michael FlowersOhio Attorney General Dave Yost, Respondent