No. 21-7008
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-protocol criminal-procedure due-process federal-constitution habeas-corpus judicial-discretion mental-evaluation state-constitution supreme-court-review
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-05-26
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-the-alabama-supreme-court-wrongfully-decided-an-important-issue
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW’ WHETHER “THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT WRONGFULLY DECIDED AN TMPORTANT LS5ue RAISED VO THEM BY PETITIONER MARCO DANE Ac oFP WHERE He WAS DENIED A THmMELY AND MEANINGFUL MENTAL EVALUATION WKEN, Tide STATE'S HIGHEST COURT WAS REPUGNANT “TO THE PREVIOUS DECISIONS RENDERED BY THS Coury AS WELLAS To TRE PROTOCOLS OF ° THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION P 1. “
Docket Entries
2022-05-31
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-05-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/26/2022.
2022-04-06
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-03-28
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/25/2022.
2021-12-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 28, 2022)