Whether the District Court erred in dismissing Plaintiff's claims

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED f A y , yd fy eye Cott ll The dstt lf CUulr? Lise” or? Me SU ee ec GrTiad L5SUC/ it LISWEZ a Dr wal He Distri1©7 Cott ChaAS Er7urtbe)f P 2 Plaintitl, uk Se Sdereme Cid vias thst Court / Lark af Appeals. cludgme jntorteg ard, If Sd What other attons could pave been MUKAI FeGuUNIG LSslle (| ani 27 . 3. plas, tik Phe Siereine Cth wl Dispr0ch LOWES Ltr i KpLea ky LT ie, J Whh while GSU Wiel Ahé Lislrtt 4 Cll TU] Nh COrMEE P 4 Hadigh lt Wk She Sitrene lilt) Th Sake GiftaP ph LLutntitt thse bY remanded We Cale DUS) Duattiel Called ? SF the Llasy hill Glo reget tt bral &rGumend Pike ie S00 TRE 1TtOS¢ O74 LISI 20