Whether the previous court erred in denying Ms. Ewing's motion based on its own merits determination of her ineffective assistance of counsel claim

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ) Ms, Ewing asserts ved ane Previcus coud exved wren ib did ot oyant a CO.A, despite she deloataloiiy of the District Cours opinion by a reasonable yo ~ 3) Ms Evang asserts ab the peviens court was in error wien “ t denied “her meton based on tS own merits determinehon ot Wer wellectine assistance of Ceunsel claim. : 3) Ms. Ewing Asserts Anat the Atbrd plea ‘Ss steading in the “manta cur OF innccerve” OS defendent iS streaked as ‘ h tres, ave gity beyend a shadew st a doubt wihout prosecuctord rn +e Prove’ such, \n post > Conviction preceeding, the Alora pe is fa oS evidena, at guilt ae such an extend Wat Subsequent @urts and | ‘wudges feel trod hey need act look Bedend such plea to Nerdy Be pt, vanccenve ot eechueness ot counsel. . : : | : |