No. 21-7015
IFP
Tags: capital-defendant court-procedure criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus incompetency incompetency-claim mental-competency substantive-claim substantive-review
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-04-14
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a court may refuse to review a capital defendant's substantive incompetency claim?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether a court may refuse to review a capital defendant’s substantive incompetency claim? i
Docket Entries
2022-04-18
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2022.
2022-03-23
Reply of petitioner Edward James filed.
2022-03-11
Brief of respondent Florida in opposition filed.
2022-03-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 14, 2022.
2022-03-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 2, 2022 to March 14, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-01-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 2, 2022)
2021-10-20
Application (21A84) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until January 27, 2022.
2021-10-14
Application (21A84) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 28, 2021 to January 27, 2022, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Edward James
Karin Lee Moore — Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Northern, Petitioner
Karin Lee Moore — Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Northern, Petitioner
Florida
Carolyn M. Snurkowski — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Carolyn M. Snurkowski — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent