No. 21-7016
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion brady-violation cellphone-search criminal-procedure due-process fourth-amendment jury-selection jury-venire motion-to-suppress sixth-amendment standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-03-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the trial Justice err, when the Jury Venire challenge, had been inappropriately addressed, concerning a proper sixth Amendment challenge? And Trial Justice abused his discretion
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED | i. Did the trial Justice err, when the Jury Venire challenge, | had been inappropriately addressed, concerning a proper sixth Amendment challenge? And Trial Justice abused his discretion. ii. Did the Trial Justice err, in denying Mr Gonzalez's motion to , suppress in full, when Warwick Police violated Gonzalez's Fourth Amendment right by covertly accessing his cellphone prior to obtaining a warrwant? iii. Did the State commit a Brady violation in supressing the CD/Disc of the"controlled Phone call"?
Docket Entries
2022-03-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2022-03-01
Waiver of right of respondent Rhode Island to respond filed.
2021-12-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 3, 2022)
Attorneys
Rhode Island