No. 21-7031
Joseph D. Davis v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: compassionate-release court-of-appeals criminal-sentencing district-of-columbia-court-of-appeals federal-procedure guidelines inconsistent-opinions judicial-discretion sentencing sentencing-guidelines united-states-sentencing-commission
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-03-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the opinion of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals concerning the Petitioner's motion for Compassionate Release is inconsistent with other opinions from courts of the United States and guidelines from the United States Sentencing Commission
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED I. Whether the opinion of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals concerning the Petitioner’s motion for Compassionate Release is inconsistent with other opinions from courts of the United States and guidelines from the United States Sentencing Commission i
Docket Entries
2022-03-07
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/4/2022.
2022-02-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-11-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 3, 2022)
Attorneys
Joseph Davis
Steven R. Kiersh — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent