No. 21-7034
Jeriton Lavar Curry, aka Cheese v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: career-offender crime-of-violence criminal-procedure district-court-error due-process hobbs-act legal-analysis sentencing-guidelines standard-of-review
Latest Conference:
2022-02-25
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a Conviction for Hobbs Act Robbery qualifies as a 'crime of violence' under the Sentencing Guidelines
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED i) Whether a Conviction for Hobbs Act Polober y qualifies as a ‘crime of violence” under the Senbencing Guidelines, U.S.5.@. 8 HO\.2(0). ? 2) Whether the District Court Committed ervey, Plan RNVOY, and dlid the evvor osfect defendant's Substantial rights ? 4) Whether the District Court Eyed, or Alternatively abused thery Aeseretion by yuliag that Conspiracy +o commit Hebbs Act Robbery Oo exe & wiolence eredicate Ker Career O€ender P we poses & s4ei.i, 2
Docket Entries
2022-02-28
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/25/2022.
2022-02-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-12-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 3, 2022)
Attorneys
Jeriton L. Curry
Jeriton Lavar Curry — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent