Whether the US Court for the 8th Circuit wrongly allowed the District Court's improper statement of a Missouri Supreme Court ruling

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. Whether the US Court for the 8th Circuit 1) wrongly allowed the District Court's improper statement of a Missouri Supreme Court ruling, which held—following Milkovich—that the existence of an underlying objective statement of fact removes constitutional protection from a defamatory statement of opinion, and 2) wrongly let stand the District Court's wrongful application of that misstated ruling, which bestowed constitutional protection on a defamatory statement of opinion directly contrary to the plain text of the ruling? Il. Whether the US Court for the 8th Circuit wrongly let stand the District Court's improper granting of a motion for summary judgment despite genuine issues of material fact—pleaded and shown—that were rightfully questions for a jury and despite Plaintiff's production of evidence demonstrating the requisite “actual malice” required by the designation—itself in error—of Plaintiff as a limited purpose public figure? i