No. 21-7047

In Re Daren Kareem Gadsden

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2022-02-03
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-violation criminal-indictment criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process federal-indictment federal-jurisdiction fifth-amendment sentencing sentencing-authority
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus Punishment Privacy
Latest Conference: 2022-02-25
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the U.S. District Court exceeded its authority and/or jurisdiction

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . Whether or not the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland exceeded its authority and/or jurisdiction by punishing petitioner _ ‘to a (23) twenty-three year sentence in Federal prison for conduct ; that does not violate any Federal law, regulation or statute. Whether or not the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland exceeded its authority by sentencing petitioner to. (9) times of (262) two-hundred and sixty-two months each in Federal prison for one Federal: offense, Whether or not the Federal Indictment in criminal case ¢ WDQ-11-0302 in which petitioner is convicted and incarcerated under is multiplicitous in violation of. the (5) Fifth Amendment Double Jeopardy clause of the United States Constitution.

Docket Entries

2022-02-28
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2022-02-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/25/2022.
2021-12-07
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.

Attorneys

In Re Daren Kareem Gadsden
DaRen Kareem Gadsden — Petitioner
DaRen Kareem Gadsden — Petitioner