Whether an attorney was ineffective for failing to argue the government failed to prove intent under 18 U.S.C. § 2119(a)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED In compliance with Holloway V. United States, 526 U.S. 1 (1991), is an attorney ineffective for failing to argue before the jury the Government failed to prove "Willis intended to cause death or serious bodily harm under 18 U.S.C. § 2119(a)?" Il. Is an attorney ineffective for failing to properly argue before the Court that Willis was entitled to a judgment of acquittal on Count Four because the Firearm was not brandished during the carjacking? .