Whether the government's seizure of petitioner's property without just compensation violates the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . | LD. Wohe Ain 200 recast By tHe Sins 40 Poncrices Perea el Osc100607 Dae: L817 Btlerst Gy CORO, HuMDULTTES THAT 1 BE Gotsity toca BFOANDUNO By Gone APIO Pennie CVE eS Iie OCEMILS, Zo NenUnls 7A oud RTHOLE ent THE MEE OF Ihy BET fo PRBLUA wONCISE DELILIND ? sew Shanti CUNDESIIOY CRM ENS, toorveut my MAUI. poe INH Mtouke to W Bi 1 Oo Meng Yt CRONDILE Img WITH BOY GOUBWIIs OLCICNS £ Courttink Cy ti, 4) Wy IS LOGE OVE 5S, UME TB Oro AL THLE 4 Corn ATE MeAUIT EN BDS OO bar Ea pen Be Coe A CAD RoE eee " WV Wns) OD, AP y Pm BCH 2:0] -C0~6ORB POU ION PL Fx SCISES CMI, LAMA es SOLDER 5, WW Bm] CRATE) 75 COVEL yp riuidDS Comme 770 BGBra MEd). Gina By Lnocororesmar, {\ orcs Ceweltous) Zo Lut EZNE oF THEN Onmy au ” Yai wrt60 Thon doucaeas LUDBWE fe Bort UILNOSS B-bGeoea oinz DOUIED ATCLee Cousmmtly' Mdeaty MM LiveIS oP towel? : Boia ME BU Loui dosecs wstmroot CETmLin Bucobucy Cum Teme. Pubs (is DesTeALt Cours OF ALICIA) L FBV toustiESs((B4 Ui 8 Carl OF hoocius -911C9) wnt MRL Tao OLA YELOLS WILT Mud TOD SuPer ING Fou °@dsvronoLd ove: fryoruo brio Ronz02 WoTtesT) — | swe Lohly 1nd 18 Gast Conde fon Thr ioe Case HCI 1599b 10 2-090 OWL BE YB mea 4s cn, ; “ SOUL EWES Littl. AGubiT LAL OP Commu BABE?