No. 21-7059

Timothy George Muller v. Michigan

Lower Court: Michigan
Docketed: 2022-02-04
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process evidence ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jurisdiction plea-bargaining substance venue
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2022-04-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the trial court erred in denying Mr. Muller's motion to withdraw his plea and vacate his conviction for delivery of a controlled substance causing death, where the alleged delivery occurred in Kent County but the charges were brought in Barry County

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED T TS PR. MULLER FRTITLED 70 wwiTHDRALS Hs PLEA AND Have His Conviction) FoR DELIVERY oF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE CAusisla DEATH VACATED, BECAUSE BARRY CouNTY WAs ABT FE PROPER VENUE JO BRwe THE. CHARGES , LINERE wale DELIVERY ALLEGEDLY OCCURRED ZA KET COUNTY AD THE DRUGS WERE TNGESTED BY WE DECEDINT IN KENT COULTY. Rt hoaer ANSWECS , * Yes “ oor Was Wis Issue NoT WAVED BY PIR. MuclERe's No COnTEST PLEA WHERE TRIAL Counlsed’s LAlluRE TO RAISE IT UNDER IUMED THE VALIDITY OF JHE PLEA ZISELF. Peds tener answers ,~ Yes “ :

Docket Entries

2022-04-04
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2022.
2021-01-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 7, 2022)

Attorneys

Timothy G. Muller
Timothy G. Muller — Petitioner
Timothy G. Muller — Petitioner