No. 21-7067
Kimmie Dwayne Baker v. Arizona
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: certiorari-review criminal-procedure due-process electronic-surveillance evidence exculpatory-evidence government-misconduct government-response judicial-procedure new-trial new-trial-motion surveillance
Key Terms:
Environmental Securities Immigration
Environmental Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-05-12
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the government was obligated to respond and contest the merits of the July 3, 2022 motion, rather than moving to dismiss on the basis of untimeliness
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. :
Docket Entries
2022-08-01
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-07-07
DISTRIBUTED.
2022-06-06
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-05-16
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/12/2022.
2022-04-12
Petitioner complied with order of March 28, 2022.
2022-03-28
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until April 18, 2022, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2022-03-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/25/2022.
2022-03-09
Waiver of right of respondent Arizona to respond filed.
2021-12-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 10, 2022)
Attorneys
Arizona
Amanda Moncayo Parker — Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Respondent
Amanda Moncayo Parker — Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Respondent