No. 21-7073

Nathaniel Collins v. Alabama

Lower Court: Alabama
Docketed: 2022-02-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process electronic-hearing in-person-hearing probation trial-court-objection video-conference virtual-hearing
Key Terms:
ERISA DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2022-03-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a virtual, video conference, or other hearing that takes place using an electronic or computer medium is sufficient to meet the due process requirements in criminal cases

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a virtual, video conference, or other hearing that takes place using an electronic or computer medium is sufficient to meet the due process requirements in criminal cases as set forth by the United States Constitution and this Court, and whether an objection to such medium is one that must be first raised at the trial court level. ~ii~

Docket Entries

2022-03-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2022-02-24
Waiver of right of respondent Alabama to respond filed.
2022-02-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 10, 2022)

Attorneys

Nathaniel Collins
David Benton KingWilliams, Driskill, Huffstutler & King, Petitioner
State of Alabama
Beth Slate PoeAL Attorney General's Office, Respondent