No. 21-7081
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure due-process evidentiary-hearing judicial-discretion jury-coercion jury-trial motion-for-new-trial
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-03-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the Defendant entitled to a hearing on jury coercion?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED lL. Was the Defendant, Marko Stasiv, entitled to have a hearing on the question of jury coercion in connection with his Motion for a New Trial when the trial judge, Judge P. Kevin Castel, denied the motion without a hearing?
Docket Entries
2022-03-07
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/4/2022.
2022-02-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-01-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 11, 2022)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent