No. 21-7092
Epati Malauulu v. United States
Tags: 18-usc-2255 constitutional-rights counsel-waiver criminal-procedure habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel post-conviction-relief section-2255 waiver
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-03-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether, Despite a Waiver, Malauulu Can Properly Raise Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims Under 18 U.S.C. § 2255?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, Despite a Waiver, Malauulu Can Properly Raise Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims Under 18 U.S.C. § 2255? TOPICAL INDEX Page QUESTION PRESENTED . 1 CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS AND REGULATIONS INVOLVED . 2 CUSTODY STATUS OF PETITIONER . 2
Docket Entries
2022-03-07
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/4/2022.
2022-02-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-02-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 11, 2022)
Attorneys
Epati Malauulu
Rose Fay Arfa — Fay Arfa, A Law Corporation, Petitioner
Rose Fay Arfa — Fay Arfa, A Law Corporation, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent