No. 21-7116
Victor Armando Acevedo v. United States
IFP
Tags: criminal-law criminal-procedure defendant-rights due-process federal-rule-of-criminal-procedure federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure judicial-procedure notice sentencing supervised-release
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-05-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether, under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 43(a)(3), a district court can lawfully impose the thirteen 'standard' supervised-release conditions without telling the defendant during the sentencing hearing that they will apply
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 43(a)(3), a district court can lawfully impose the thirteen “standard” supervised-release conditions without telling the defendant during the sentencing hearing that they will apply. i
Docket Entries
2022-05-23
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/19/2022.
2022-04-29
Reply of petitioner Victor Acevedo filed.
2022-04-18
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2022-03-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 18, 2022.
2022-03-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 17, 2022 to April 18, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-02-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 17, 2022)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Victor Acevedo
Doug Keller — The Law Office of Doug Keller, Petitioner
Doug Keller — The Law Office of Doug Keller, Petitioner