No. 21-7117

Frederick Allen v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-02-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel government-misconduct ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-misconduct judicial-misrepresentation plagiarism witness-testimony
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2022-03-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was Frederick Muse's constitutional right to due process violated when the district court plagiarized a 31-count word-for-word/comma-for-comma misrepresentation originally attributable to the government upon which relief was denied?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

estions Presenreo C11 Was freveerek Muse's COWSTEToTLOwAL RIGHT TO , Dre PRocesS VIOLATED wWHed THe Drsrerct Covet PLACTARTZED A 31-Couwt Woed-FoRWORD /comma~ FOR-COMMA MISREPRESEDTATION ORIGINALLY ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE Mloveewment UPoN WHICH RELIEF WAS DEnreD? (al Was cFreveerce Auen'’s ConstETUTFowAlL RIGHT TO THE EFFECTIVE ASSESTANCE OF COUNSEL VIOLATED WHEN WES TRIAL CoposeL FAILED TO RECCONTZE AUD OBJECT T A itciszo eEnrok mavttest WHED THE Moveeoment FASLED TO DISClosE PvRTHG OR BEFORE TRIAL THAT THE KEY WITNESS HAD GEES SPARED A MANDATORY LIFE SeEOTENCE TS EXCHAME FOR HIS COOPERAT LON? mit Arst OF Papttes Jou partres APPEAR IN THE CaPTroo OO THE COvER PAGE, mite . Clase oF Cowtests ¢ Gerozons Betow O\ ‘ <pustoozcr ron 02 * Constrtut rosa AND Srarowey Provrstoss Auvowuep 03 © ATATEMENT OF THe CASE 08 e Reasons for dleasrrog THe Wer [t © Conervston 30 -tv. Anoex to _berewnsces © Morton Unoee 28 O.S.0. $ 2ASS wren Memoeasoom t © Response gy Unrten Arates Jbrroewey se) ‘ ° Reew . Cc © Duster Cover's DHenrar yy) © Norse of heres € © Morsos For eave To ProceeD rn Forma Paureets of © Groce Apassia cleave To feocee> x roma pavers & © Moron Yuen fern Rue or Crun Proceome 54Qe) at * Orvee (3-Lrwes) Dewison Roe S4leS Motrow Si * Motron For Recvsac Porsumm to 28 U.S.C, $$ 144 4 45S 4 © Grveg Denon Motroo for RecusAL K * Request ror Ceerescate of JDPPEALABITTY ‘CCor) A * Over peavsen COA WM © Morton Fe Reneseron N *QGevee Denon Revereros ‘a + Crewe o¢ Proressswa Reswmsstorurm Comptatnt p + fnsuen Derererne Reseorse to GPR. Commator 0. ~y | cfasie of Ydotnoertzes Crreo CASES. . Pack NUMBER, * Dro v. Marra, 373. 0.5. 83 (19095 \7, 20 ¢ sero v. Uncen Srares, 405 0S. 150 (19H) 13, It, 40 ( ‘ Ac m Histen Annes, 510 U.S. 540, 548-5] 4 ; ° drarcxano _v. Wasumaton, Hoe U.S. LL Jl (984 | * Fezeeo v. Lorrrorro Recovery, vdssoes., A.A. C., a5 WF 3d 483, Ges (5™ Cre. 3020) ° Uncen sums v, vous, 769 Fvbpex 138 i Cre. g014 *tarren Arares_vi Cégcea, 134 F.3d 844, 859 al . HW Cre, [448 Statutes any Qoves °21BS.C. § 80a03) [i940] 14 eal USC. 3 84l (bya) ¥, 10,14 Al U.S.C, $ B84, mtarmenr Noe 2018 0 eae U.S.C. § 144 Id 14, 24 a6, at va¥ U.S.C. $ 455. Id, 4-94 vi "28 UiS.C. § 2a53 (eda) \Y 43 eay U.S.C. $ 425s 3, a4 © Consrrtorros or tHe Unrreo Srares Le Peconer XIV (Due Process Cravse) 13-\4 “Fever Rove or Abrreware Peoceoure HO 1S tHeorem Rue or Crm Proceoee 52(e) \\ -Vit CN SHE Averemne Court or THE Unrteo Arates Petition For err of Ceatroraer mW PeTETIONER RESPECTFOULM PRANS THAT A WRIT OF CERTIORARI ISSUE TO REVIEW THE JudGmELT BELOW, Crmitanrs Seow ; Cases From cFevera. Covers: . | Sue ORDER oF tHe Dsstescr Cover For THE Nortrees QOasreccr OF Sees Appears AT ApPewnrx 6) AND IS UnPusLISHED. (DENYrNG $2955 RevteF). ecSue ORDER of THe cftent Coreurr Cover of JbPeals frrenes ar Jppreworx M Aud Is UnPuBLESHED. DENY A CERTEFECATE OF VbPPEALABILETY ). ‘Sue ORDER of THe <frem Crecorr Court or Seren Apoeces AT Jbprewotx CO any 5S UmpuBLTSHEd, (Diwse Revers). | *clre ORDER of the Dersreret Cover foe THE Noxrreas Drsteacr of Jems Apreaes at SDereworx of. (Dersoa Kure SIC) ReTEF), (Aud ts voverrsHen). ‘dhe ORDER of tHE DHrsterct Cover roe THE Noetees Dusreccr or cfexas afeears ar Jbppennmx 4 AND IS Uvrvstsuen. (Denne Recosar), -| Spurtsprcr ton Sue Supemeor of THe Unerep Srates Cover or Jhyreats FoR THE trem Crecurt was EOTERED on Vovemsee OF, 202}, [Aoreenpcx J], Reena was DENTED on Cpe O%, 20a2. [Aprewoex OT. cfurs PETITtos FoR WRIT OF CERTSoRARE IS Trme, PRourpED THE Ceetcercare oF Ceruce AVERS DELEVERN To PRISG OFFICFALS ON OR perore Feoroaey OF, 1092, wuter is 4! PANS AFTE® THE Stem Crecosts Deora of Vbues's COA Reavest. : due 90™ DM FAUS ON A uno, THOS AFFoRDTO, VDLLEO OVE ApprrzsAt DAY TO UTILIZE THE Persos Maren Roe ») Sporsgrserzee OF Tucs Cour IS pvockED Unnen QB U.S.C. $ 1ASH/1), WHICH HowDs: Casts ID THE COURT OF APPEALS MAY BE REUCEWED BY THE sAweeeme Covet BY THE FOLLOWING METHODS! C1) Ba werr oF CeRtmoRARt GRavten UPod THE PETITIONER OF ANY

Docket Entries

2022-03-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2022-02-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-02-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 17, 2022)

Attorneys

Frederick Allen
Frederick Allen — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent