Roy Franklin Echols, Jr. v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
DueProcess Securities
Did the United States District Court err in denying the initial request to expedite process?
No question identified. : QUESTION{S) PRESENTED . 1. Did the United States District Court Error by denying the January 13,2020, initial No.t CSxX Transportation Corporate Headquarters Address to expedite process? 2. Did the United States District Court Fail to disclose the U.S. Marshals returned unexecuted Summons inFormation that prohibited Petitioner From Complying tuith the Statutory requirements Under Fed.R.Civ. Proc. 4(m)? 3. Did the United States District Court cleprive EchoLs o Right to Notice of Summons And duty to cliscLose this . Factual inFormation pursuant to Feel. Rule Civil Proc. 26 ? 4. Didthe United States District Court deprive Echols oF ~ his right under the Americans usith Disabilities Act (ADA) Lv Title I. with the physical impairment oF Stage IM. Cancer to proceed without Counsel under 28U.S-C.Sec.1915 (@)C1) ? 5. Did the united States District Court deprive Echols oF . remedial and humaniterian provisions under FELA LAul that imposes Liability to protect the saFety oF railroad | employees set Forth in FELA 4Su.s.c.$51? 6. Did the United States District Court Fail to hold CSX | Transportation Accountable For Echols FELA Claim by violating OSHA ancl FSAA regulations designed to protect people From unsafe tiork environments, Luithin the meaning OF FELA YS UsS.C. $$ 54-60(2012)P | 1. Did the United States CourtoF Appeals For the | — Fourth Ciccuit Abuse its discretion by denying Ct| Appointed CounseLwunder 28U.S.¢.Sec.1945(e) (1) | relating to Covid-19 Limitations Gi.e€. No SX} Law Liabrary Attendence to Access Local rules s prepare ncsiiimiiaeaae