Whether this Court should grant writ of certiorari regarding denial of the timely request for the substantial right of de novo determination by Article Ill Judicial Officer without Report and Recommendation (R&R) on dispositive matters

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether this Court should grant writ of certiorari regarding denial of the timely request for the substantial right of de novo determination by Article Ill Judicial Officer without Report and Recommendation (R&R) on dispositive matters. 2. Whether denial of the substantial right of de novo determination by Article III Judicial Officer without Report and Recommendation (R&R) on dispositive matters, hereafter coerced R&R, on dispositive matters impermissibly denies/diminishes substantial rights including, but not limited to, judicial review through change in the standard of review and/or diminished time to file appeal of R&R. 3. Whether this Court should grant writ of certiorari regarding the propriety of and/or lack of jurisdiction for referring to a magistrate a motion for the substantial right of de novo determination by Article III Judicial Officer without Report and Recommendation (R&R) on dispositive matters. 4.Whether this Court should remand because the lower appellate court misapprehends appealability and/or overlooks the request and denial in the district court for certification of appeal and motion for stay pending appeal of } denial of substantial rights incapable of vindication on appeal. | |