Whether the lower court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims

No question identified. : ; pg QUESTICN(S) oar oh yuiorol enSiclor OV SOULS. 2 VCUINR Toy Sf QLige f yf ily ite Lair? LAE 5 bye wi LWP autre Testa siti OE Lahn? Tul 5 Vial ber ED Tye. Cull pedenhiely Attulpate dhl. Shag 1 chiniee| MO Auk, (yecesS DAS (ESET | Lis Shee jprse ; whpryte Jofé fy fh “go (GL AMEE , OO me & TA P / ) élid The. Tio fe oe nnd Su WES IV) CF pe Pa e “ ; od hei fp fe fs ¢ “Ane Fly /i ECP MAly fo p hodewrraad love ji fe a) . i), “ hog i ef caso /. haa is) [Bie LAL fF POEL “4 . hap WADE eh ryal Basie Sams & Preptaly Cl nn nel The joy . vt Lo. “4 at ns ae Al . pate } 7 i 4 AN “f Bde Pree fe . RAT A LN a a 4 ainwh 62s ‘iH sarin Ane 49 Leite Cecords ham The Gury Lychan 3 CT) Cafes V; tl by pe