No. 21-7157
Richard Lucas v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-split cocaine cocaine-definition controlled-substances criminal-arrest criminal-procedure plain-error probable-cause statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Takings FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
Takings FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-03-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a state statute's definition of 'cocaine' differs from the federal definition based on the plain, unambiguous language of the statutes
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Ifa state statue’s definition of “cocaine” differs from the federal definition of “cocaine” based on the plain, unambiguous language of the statutes, is the District Court’s failure to notice this difference “clear” and “obvious” for the purpose of “plain error” review? 2. Whether an individual who runs away from a police encounter can be arrested when the basis of the arrest is not established? i
Docket Entries
2022-03-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2022-02-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2022-02-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 21, 2022)
Attorneys
Richard Lucas
Robert Charles Singer — Singer Legal PLLC, Petitioner
Robert Charles Singer — Singer Legal PLLC, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent