Whether merit injury claims suffice in the undecided open proceedings

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether merit injury claims suffice in the undecided open proceedings; titled thereunder; "Williams v. U.S.," 1:21-CV01632-EMR; thereof United States Court of Federal Claims. 2. Whether complainant's invoked Title 28, Ch., 91, U.S.C. § 1491 (a) (1) injury claims undecided adjudication decree suffice as being protracted and delayed Pursuant RCFC J thereof a normal aligned judicial proceedings permissible appellate review travel. LY 3. Whether with pursuance conformity to RCFC 8 (1) (2) (3) plaintiff’s controverter pleading substantive provision Title 26; Ch., 65; U.S.C. § 6402 (a) (c) violations; il infers defendant’s reprehensible omissions plausible actionable civil suit claims, as being presented in clear absence of, a genuine issue of material fact of substantive injuries; to advance plaintiff’s allegations beyond Title 28, Ch., 91, U.S.C. § 1491 (a) (1) “money-mandating” Statute redress standard prerequisite to suit jurisdiction; for allowing monetary and equitable injury recoveries pursuant Title 26; Ch., 65; U.S.C. § 6402 (g); (n); as expressly implied by United States Secretary of Treasury ascribed recommendation of allowable competent court of law civil suit recourse and monetary recovery of the tax years ineffect overpayment refund credit being misapplied. MW