Why hasn't my lawyer answered any of my phone calls or come to see me?

No question identified. : QUESTEONG) PRESENTED . ROLE ltt (a) le Why hasnt my Lawyer answered any of my prone calls of came “rot hSy me! ; ° ‘ 2. Why hag nw my Law yer Lawrenee Corrales henoved the oath of abFvwation, AS an attocney and as a coundelot ot ys cove X, Conducted hyn self vprightly and attording +o ae) in support of the Constitytion of the United Sates, as well as fue DA, Fred CiSmicth , and “The State A OWA om K etal. pycsvank to the les of the Suprem @ Lougt [ Pact WAT RVEYS AND COUNSELORS | BLE $. Admission to the Bar Py "s mandayions? ' 3, Why hasnt my ap printed a Movney Lawrence Corrales Fitea Todicial Como larasts om the fesrdine, Todyes and p.Ars for wort honoetay the oath by sari shying dwe process of The law and eqval prev eetven under the laws 4 Why Nasa my lawyer fila an Amievs Curiae. brief before the courr for Consideration of a petition for a weit of cerriorart moxion Loe leave +o File a bi if com plain’, jpateaier toma Statement cha ema ino, jociseetion j within 3D clays direc she cage was placed on the clocket 9¢ within UO days a5 preseribed : by Rule 37, a the Supreme Covet Rules? | 5, Why hasnt my attorney aad the The State of ORL Hom A, et, 2 henered any) i my) PRO SE MoT Eos | that they are Supposed +o respond +o, 48 promptly as possible Considlerina he natore of the revel spe ht and any asserted need tor emergency action p and » ym any event, within Do day § ét ceceipt unless the Coort ofa Tostice, op the Clerk under Bele 30:4 | orders otherwise ° Wha hastat mn law yer honered the “Pury £ Candor" and the “Lomi ty Clause “ 45 well as the Petvileg es Gud Lamuniries Clavge” within (20 days mandated by a 7, Why hasnt the “ofreecs ot the court” reviewed the exevt otery evidence” aecording ¥o law) pertaining To the evidence I presented ta ny“ msorio. + ismiss', showing Pray ae “State” hasnt baristied “Feds Rb Evia, Gon xs % well as foe “oy satisfying *Tivhe 21 F143) Rober* v. State . ectaining to the “element” A she said Dicer Charnes have'nt oven on met ey legall y vharne me with, alleged charges? a. why hasint my appoinaed Counsel , Mc. Lawrenée Corrales, Voiced the “Sucisdicavonal: Fact Dootcine ” and requested a Trial De Neve" becouse ot my “Pure Pleg’”? 4, Why hain my Lawyer pquvestioned these people's ethie's becayse A the Conse ence . of he Covet” ag well a8 Kor“ Shecking The Conscrence” fo pe covet because A them allows ing the Cort +o vse in) He Ue gal Enacted Criminal S$7qTuTE Uday was ootlawed be. Caysa A Ws excessrvenese 1 Aeeocding to (OBAMA VEL RENO) , 4etiay in +he Color As law, but aot under the legal avdheciay ok la wt ; Page 4] 10. wing has my lawyer Ve Lawrence allowed rhe court +0 contiavally give me WNegal, unecessary. Eguet econcinuanets anc -hreater me with alredermire 6 and on illegal oretve,