No. 21-7161

Deja Paschal v. Connecticut

Lower Court: Connecticut
Docketed: 2022-02-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process equivocal-request right-to-counsel self-representation sixth-amendment waiver
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-03-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the defendant's request for self-representation was unequivocal, despite being made in the context of a request for new counsel

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

question presented was first decided is unreported. See Pet. App. Al, A9. . JURISDICTION The Connecticut Supreme Court issued its opinion on November 23, 2021. This petition is being filed within 90 days of that order. This Court has . jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1257(a). . CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS INVOLVED The Sixth Amendment to the United States , Constitution provides: In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be : confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defence. U.S. Const. amend. VI.

Docket Entries

2022-03-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2022-02-28
Waiver of right of respondent State of Connecticut to respond filed.
2022-02-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 21, 2022)

Attorneys

Deja Paschal
James B. StreetoOCPD-LSU, Petitioner
James B. StreetoOCPD-LSU, Petitioner
State of Connecticut
Laurie Nadine FeldmanAppellate Bureau, OCSA, Respondent
Laurie Nadine FeldmanAppellate Bureau, OCSA, Respondent