M. D. v. Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services, Child and Family Services Division, et al.
Securities
Why was TL not afforded rights to due process?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED -\Why wos TL nor afforded vigtts to due e cocess ? -Yow was it decided thet 2 hed “Com pitent” Quimpade couns!! when m coungil advised me to wor Pen ee ond ma Comnsil’ failed to object te NOUS 1 5SUCS 4 Ave . . : Me Sereat ment plan? proceedings Including Lecco tment p len rohen the dapes EVE. section U)OS +o ve completed by were overt G &ix) Months mss ko DFS inuolvemers end over ft Cord year prot ve ie Weng Coury ocdeced? “Why Wet 19Swes waived on cr pee to he State Surseme Cowl becarsse TD didwnt object er the Distric conch? ¥ Doesnt This show thet “y cous: | UaasneT com pittat during, the ecocde (ney s 2 XK Ds5ns+ my couns) | supposed! +e rate these VSSUKHES We cemnse TL dow st Vese Lnow leolg e of the | \ex9 o¢ proceedings? = Loy wos Wo decided tht Mad “Banderme atally far prove dings when om cou nse | Clearly eid ithe or no akkentios fo any Vee ducing The proceedings? eae) Was No wea Whe IVE +o thee progre 54 x TOKE ON mm A reatment plan 7 EW ne DFS Wocker said on vecord +, + che of aktemt +o NOrify my proacess Ge rnereraate © ee What DE had iodo a eet (Twas SHU decided Whe DES worker. Gaid on vecotd het +e feectegn Qian Vous TEMPO SSTBLE foc Me to complete in He QiVEN Time Frame, thow 15 +hic Used to decide ttermincke my parental vights? oncige “Why 1S the sta ndeed of eviderce g0 low is Ssomethiag as Mpoctany OS perente| cightz? HWhy wos a molion bo shoe contact betoeen aK mcr and ae Ay eee Sede ved usithout my) \awyer Vaving % hence fo cnswer wh oka’ boeen mw x subsequently the Slack of contncr bon to 3 Child and T was, sed ae garkral Wass Ferminabl my cig Nt fo Vn , AnNS ave = Shouldnct ‘EvE x event thet v0 oO Noon poten Pluie child be otforded thet rig ASS Ming, Hay Aart vor Ving ond Wawtiay te Odeese 1VSSHES with mente) bece AA ondJo¢ Che mai cel dependency in ofber to be a positive Corce VA Whe childs (oe? —L wos told that the Cede! courts Mor aot cee pt mY ectihien We cause... my nid doesn it FaX\ unker ‘hus “Spadian “Chi id We (fare Pet Ps Wel | ay wh COS€ having OO Aitberent thanderd because of my chy me not Yet ag an ‘endian, Doesn et Aclicle W ; Section Z, Sub section Ee the BS Conshtution geruate me ara Tv Me cites o& each state shall be enttled to OM MAN Mages Qnd Smmunities of citizens in the seneval stebess? (See ppgerdix 2) a } Doesnt the constitudon gaructee me veview wren this coury He Cause ney ow Uni tea Stetec Ciben oen Tyorrh m hy d X @ The Dadian “ie ten ed Ape Pesnst Lo\U cancer ~ Why did the distvich Courk continue with fermi nayion \neavins When My Nave see osted! fy Woitkdvaw dur + conklick of intevest? nes Whs * ee ii Acero contact lett my seli and mw cnt OVGeeY Without my \ravia a rau ko rospond ko Mu moon? J ane) ARO