No. 21-7176
Leandra Marrio Chisholm, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: commerce-clause constitutional-challenge criminal-law due-process federal-jurisdiction federal-offense jurisdictional-clause robbery statutory-interpretation vagueness
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw
AdministrativeLaw
Latest Conference:
2022-03-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is an Interference of Commerce by Robbery conviction for the robbery of a single retail store beyond the scope of the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. Is an Interference of Commerce by Robbery conviction for the robbery of a single retail store beyond the scope of the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution? IL. Should the jurisdiction clause of Interference of Commerce by Robbery be void for vagueness? ii LIST OF ALL
Docket Entries
2022-03-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2022-02-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-02-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 25, 2022)
Attorneys
Leandra Chisholm, Jr
Jeffrey C. Rager — Rager Law Firm, Petitioner
Jeffrey C. Rager — Rager Law Firm, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent