No. 21-7179

Precious Wiley v. Department of Veterans Affairs, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2022-02-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process eisenhower-army-medical-center federal-tort-claims-act medical-malpractice medical-negligence pro-se-litigation service-of-process standing wrongful-death
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-04-14
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Why did the district court dismiss the appellant's Federal Tort Claims Act complaint alleging wrongful death due to medical negligence?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Why did the district court, order suasponte dismissing the appellant Precious Wiley Pro-se complaint under the Federal Tort claims Act alleging the wrongful death of her husband, Mr. Randy B. Wiley, due to an Eisenhower Army Medical Center Employees negligence. 2.Why was in her husband medical records was another person with someother kind of treatment other than what her husband was there for. 3. Why did the district court found that Mrs. Wiley failed to effectually proper service on Eisenhower Army Medical Center(EAMC) and the other Defendants, the appellant Wiley used the Address that was provided to her, she mail the Complaint with all the proper Documents. 4. Why was the Defendants did not respond to the documents, that she served each of the defendants with a copies of the complaint by certified mail and mail copies of the certified notices to the Veterans Affairs office and the United State Attorney for the Southen District of Georgia. 5. Why did the Defendants did not Responded to the appellant complaint after placing a copy of the summons and complaint in the U. S. Postal service. ; SO”

Docket Entries

2022-08-01
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-07-07
DISTRIBUTED.
2022-05-03
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-04-18
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2022.
2022-03-24
Waiver of right of respondent Department of Veterans Affairs, et al. to respond filed.
2021-11-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 25, 2022)

Attorneys

Department of Veterans Affairs, et al.
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Precious Wiley
Precious Wiley — Petitioner
Precious Wiley — Petitioner