No. 21-7180

Hung M. Nguyen v. Cache Creek Casino Resort

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-02-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights civil-rights-statutes constitutional-rights due-process federal-question interstate-commerce self-government tribal-sovereign-immunity
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2022-04-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does Cache Creek Casino Resort the subclass member of Yocha Dehe Wintum Nation as the tribal Indian of United States as trustee who owns this gambling class III as Cache Creek Casino Resort qualify for tribal sovereign immunity when it violated the Federal authorities under interstate commerce (42USC 2000a, 42USC 2000a1, 42USC 2000a2, 42USC 2000a3, 42USC 2000a5, 42USC 2000a6) which has been guaranteed by Constitution of United States — Article 1 Section 8 Clause 3 (Cited Weeks v. United States 406 F. Supp. 1309 (W.D. Okla. 1975 — Senior Judge of the United States Court of Appeal for the tenth Circuit William Judson Holloway Jr.) with self government 25 USC 1301(1)(2) with the constitutional rights Under 25 USC 1302 (a,b,c,d,e,f). Under 28 USC 1331 Federal question as due process violation?

Question Presented (from Petition)

Question presented Does Cache Creek Casino Resort the subclass member of Yocha Dehe Wintum Nation as the tribal Indian of United States as trustee who owns this gambling class III as Cache Creek Casino Resort qualify for tribal sovereign immunity when it violated the Federal authorities under interstate commerce (42USC 2000a, 42USC 2000a1, 42USC 2000a2, 42USC 2000a3, 42USC 2000a5, 42USC 2000a6) which has been guaranteed by Constitution of United States — Article 1 Section 8 Clause 3 (Cited Weeks v. United States 406 F. Supp. 1309 (W.D. Okla. 1975 — Senior Judge of the United States Court of Appeal for the tenth Circuit William Judson Holloway Jr.) with self government 25 USC 1301(1)(2) with the constitutional rights Under 25 USC 1302 (a,b,c,d,e,f). Under 28 USC 1331 Federal question as due process violation? II.

Docket Entries

2022-04-25
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/22/2022.
2022-02-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 25, 2022)

Attorneys

Hung M. Nguyen
Hung M. Nguyen — Petitioner
Hung M. Nguyen — Petitioner