What-methods-for-service-of-process-must-a-court-accept-when-mail-signature-services-and-personal-process-services-were-suspended

QUESTIONS PRESENTED TO THIS COURT ARE: 1) What Methods For Service-Of-Process By Litigants and/or Others Must A Court Accept When All Mail Signature-Services and Most State's Personal Process-Services Had Been SUSPENDED, (Starting In February 2020) Where Service Was Performed As Required By COVID Orders and/or Written-Law? } 2) Under What Conditions Is A Magistrate-Judge Allowed To Violate Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 73 | and 28 U.S.C. § 636 (c) By To A Case, Without The Consent Of Any | Litigant and/or Member Of The Case, In Order To Rule Over The Case? | 3) Under What Conditions Are Litigants and/or Others Allowed To Utilize The Mail Service | Tracking-Reports As Proof-Of-Service Due To COVID Operational Guidelines Issued By FEDEX, UPS, USPS and Others In March 2020, Which Had SUSPENDED and Made Signature-Services For Mail and/or Package Deliveries Un-Available? | 4) Under What Conditions Are Courts Allowed To Defy and/or Reject The Supreme Court Rulings and Written-Law While Exceeding Their Jurisdictional Authority In Order To Deny The Proper-Review Of A Case Under Article III, Section 2 Of The U.S. Constitution Due To Questions Of Law Raised By The COVID Crisis? , 5) Under What Conditions Is The Appeals Court Allowed To REFUSE To Allow A VOID Judgement On A Lower Court Ruling, While REFUSING To Allow A Re-Trial Where Their Only Act Was To Affirm The Lower Court Ruling To Block All Reconsideration, Re-Hearing and/or Review To Conceal The Court’s Criminal Misconduct? 6) Under What Conditions Are Courts, Judges and/or Others Allowed To Defy, Reject and/or Violate Their State’s and/or Other’s COVID Orders and/or Written-Laws By; a) Ordering Service-Of-Process Be Performed By Using Methods Known To Be A Violation Of The Orders and/or Written-Laws, and/or Was NOT-AVAILABLE? b) Blocking Allowed Alternative-Methods For Service-Of-Process, Where These Court’s Order Endangered The Health, Safety Of Officials, Servers and Others? : c) Rejecting Service-Of-Process By A Litigant Falsely-Claiming That It Was An Alternative-Method NOT Allowed For Use Where The Court Later Ordered The SameService Be Performed In A Manner Violating Orders and/or Written-Laws? d) Denying A Litigant’s Civil and/or Constitutional Rights By Refusing To Allow Evidence, Oral-Arguments and/or Legally-Required Review Of His Case Where NO Issues Within The Appeals-Brief Were Actually-Addressed and This Case NEVER Had A LegitimateReview? e) By Posting Public-Statements To Internet Sites During The Plaintiff's Case That Informed The Defendants By Illegal-Claims That, “he Defendants Were NOT Required To Respond To The Service Of Their Summons”? f) Dismissing A Case and/or Refusing To Allow This Plaintiff's Appeal Due To The Court’s and/or Other’s Violations Of Orders and/or Written-Laws Where Service-Of-Process Was Performed As The Orders and/or Written-Laws Prescribed? | LIST-OF-PARTIES [ ] All Parties Appear In The Caption Of The Case On The Cover Page. [X] All Parties DO-NOT Appear In The Caption Of The Case On The Cover Page. A List Of All