No. 21-7188

Elishay Banks v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-02-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal appellate-review counsel-performance criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel legal-error ninth-circuit standard-of-review
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-03-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is it error by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to fail to consider the petitioner's argument concerning the ineffective assistance of counsel obvious on its face

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Is it error by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to fail to consider the petitioner’s argument concerning the ineffective assistance of counsel obvious on its face. 2

Docket Entries

2022-03-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2022-03-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main Document
2022-02-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 25, 2022)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionProof of Service

Attorneys

Elishay Banks
Michael L. Crowley — Crowley Law Group, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent