No. 21-7203

Hamid Michael Hejazi v. Michael Schwab

Lower Court: Oregon
Docketed: 2022-02-25
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: adverse-judgment appellate-procedure appellate-review civil-procedure court-dismissal due-process jurisdiction jurisdictional-requirements procedural-default service-of-notice service-of-process standing
Latest Conference: 2022-04-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was it justified for the appellate commissioner to dismiss Petitioner's appeal

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED \) Was i+ justified Loc +ne appellate Commissuner to dismiss Petitioner's appeal, on +he grounds that fetition| er failed to serve the notice of appeal on the naverse” pachy within 30 days of entry of the | judgement — when there was no adverse party to be Secved, no Opposing (other) party having | been Served, Summoned oppenced, 0 povticipated | i Cy lowec Caut+ proceeding 2 2) was the Oregon Supreme Coust justified in denying review of tne appellate CAUCH decisten | —in So for aS the appetiate Court wrongly attrivuted to the other party (Michael | pasty ‘Respondent 7 | Fage 2 of I | Hejazi v. Senwab

Docket Entries

2022-04-25
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2022-04-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/22/2022.
2021-08-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 28, 2022)

Attorneys

Hamid Michael Hejazi
Hamid Michael Hejazi — Petitioner
Hamid Michael Hejazi — Petitioner