Whether the United States Supreme Court should permit the United States Navy to violate its own procedures, regulations, and the Constitution

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether or not the United States Supreme Court should permit or allow the United States Navy to violate and disregard its own naval procedures; navy regulations; the United States Code; and, the Constitution of the United States? Whether or not the United States Supreme Court should exercise “jurisdiction,” under "Tucker," when petitioner did not wait "six years" until after "navy retirement;" but, began immediately attempting to correct this "injustice," after the navy took him off of the navy's temporary disability retired list, and the Secretary of the Navy placed him back on "active duty.” (It was only, then, that petitioner discovered “all of the adverse material," placed into his "record," after his being transferred to the Long Beach Naval Hospital; and, his placement upon the navy's "temporary disability retirement list, the TDRL). Whether or not the United States Supreme Court wishes to establish jurisdiction, based upon the United States' Constitutional "Due Process Clause;" or, the conspiracy of my administrative officer, Mr. Wolff, and his co-conspirators? In 1983, the Board of Corrections for Naval Records (BCNR), removed all of the "adversematerial,” from my "service-jacket,” but refused to consider" restoring my thirteenyear, hard, earned “Ensign-promotion" to the Medical Service Corps.