Did the relitigation of the CLOSED Florida 2 Federal District Court case United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. James Thomas Webb (Case S.D. Fla. F.D.Ct.) by the Eastern District of North Carolina Federal District Court in 2012, many years after the Settlement Agreement in the case, signed by both Webb and chief Securities and Exchange Enforcement Agent and Southern District of Florida United States Attorney A. David Williams, violate Webb's constitutional protections against double jeopardy by the same sovereign; and does [the] post closure retention of jurisdiction by a Federal District Court Judge in Florida, give the Florida Federal Court jurisdiction to hear Webb's Great Writ in order to consider correcting a defacto life sentence of James Thomas Webb, a black American affordable home builder?

No question identified. : ee Question 1. ; Did the relitigation of the CLOSED Florida 2 Federal District Court case United States Securities and Exchange Commission | : ve James Thomas Webb | (Case S.D. Fla. F.D.Ct.) ‘ | ; by . th Eastern District of North Carolina Hpderal District Court in 2012, many years after the Settlement Agreement in the case, signed by both Webb and chief Securities | and Exchange Enforcement Agent and Southern District of Florida ; | United States Attorney A. David Williams, violate Webb's constitutionl protections against double jeopardy by the same sovereign; and does [the] post closure retention of jurisdiction by a Federal District Court Judge in Florida, give the Florida Federal Court jurisdiction to hear Webb's Great Writ in order ; ; to consider correcting a defacto life sentence of . : , James Thomas Webb . a black American affordable home builder? i ; OS | , Question 2. | Did North Carolina federal court's exercise of personal jurisdiction over James Webb | meet the requirements of due process or did it violate the notions of fair play and substantial justice in this case where, the Southern District of Florida federal court { held original federal jurigdiction, included { a settlement agreement between U.S.A. and Webb ! in the final judgment, closed the case and then , "retained" both personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction over the matter? | | | | | | . ii | Rule 14 71 (b) (ii) _