No. 21-7217
Thomas Allen Twobabies v. Oklahoma
IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure federal-jurisdiction major-crimes-act mcgirt-decision montgomery-v-louisiana native-american-law oklahoma-court-of-criminal-appeals retroactivity schriro-v-summerlin supreme-court-precedent tribal-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2022-04-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma applies to the Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes for Major Crimes Act purposes
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. WHETHER THIS COURT’S DECISION IN MCGIRT V. OKLAHOMA APPLIES TO THE CHEYENNE AND ARAPAHO TRIBES FOR MAJOR CRIMES ACT PURPOSES. 2. WHETHER THE OKLAHOMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ANNOUNCED IN MCGIRT V. OKLAHOMA AS PROCEDURAL RATHER THAN SUBSTANTIVE IS IN CONFLICT WITH THIS COURTS DECISION IN SCHRIRO V. SUMMERLIN, 542 U.S. 348,35 1-52(2004) 3. WHETHER IN MONTGOMERY V. LOUISANA 136 S.CT.718, ANALYSIS IS SUBSTANTIATED IN CASE ,WHICH IS IN CONFLICT WITH THIS COURTS DECISION. , | | | . | | | : | | ; | |
Docket Entries
2022-04-25
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/22/2022.
2022-02-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 28, 2022)