No. 21-7224
Johnathan I. Alcegaire v. Florida
IFP
Tags: capital-case capital-punishment due-process false-evidence false-testimony giglio giglio-claim jury-instructions jury-prejudice prosecutorial-misconduct
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-04-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Florida Supreme Court ignored fundamental principles of due process in rejecting the petitioner's Giglio claim and whether there is a reasonable likelihood that the false statements made by the prosecutor could have affected the judgment of the jury
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented to this Court is whether the Florida Supreme Court ignored fundamental principles of due process in rejecting Alcegaire's Giglio claim and whether there is a reasonable likelihood that the false statements made by the prosecutor could have affected the judgment of the jury. ! Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972). i STATEMENT OF
Docket Entries
2022-05-02
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/29/2022.
2022-04-12
Reply of petitioner Johnathan Alcegaire filed. (Distributed)
2022-04-12
Notice of substitution as counsel of record submitted by counsel for petitioner.
2022-03-29
Brief of respondent Florida in opposition filed.
2022-02-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 30, 2022)
2022-01-14
Application (21A320) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until February 24, 2022.
2022-01-10
Application (21A320) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 25, 2022 to March 26, 2022, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Florida
Carolyn M. Snurkowski — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Johnathan Alcegaire
Alice Beth Copek — Capital Collateral Regional Counsel - North, Petitioner