AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Does the Illinois Supreme Court's opinion and analysis constitute an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the Illinois Supreme Court's expansion of the Involuntary Intoxication Statute, 720 ILCS 5/6-3?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) Does the Illinois Supreme Court's opinion and analysis constitute an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the Illinois Supreme Court's expansion of the Involuntary Intoxication Statute, 720 ILCS 5/6-3 ? 2) Whether the Illinois Supreme Court errd by weighing evidence without first | holding an evidentiary hearing, where medical experts could formulate expert opinions as to the “unwarned side-effects of prescription psychotropic | medications" ? 3) Should Schriro v. Summerlin, 124 S. Ct. 2519 (2004) be applied to relieve a state prisoner of conduct that was once unlawful if the new procedure alters the range of conduct that the law punishes ? 4) Should Bousley v. United States, 118 S. Ct. 1604 (1998) be applied to relieve a state prisoner of conduct that a defendant stands convicted of 'an act the law does not make criminal ? i.