No. 21-7239
Michael Arrington v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel post-conviction-relief sixth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2022-03-25
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in denying petitioner's motion for a new trial based on ineffective assistance of trial counsel
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : i iz . i ; . . i . ti : il ° y | () ON ' ——— i AN Wet¥n es 110, DuAS? WAYUES ATOIM, Tine, CePA | De TR. AOYUCE Oo ™M AVA VENT Gly maven ‘ 1 r { | : CK OI WEAVE vice M A IMS Trance . 1 OOVeElA WY a =e VE 00S — CanvinbnYi song | ESeSeS——e—
Docket Entries
2022-03-28
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/25/2022.
2022-03-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-12-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 31, 2022)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent