Was the Pennsylvania State Court's ruling supported by the evidence and free from legal error when it held that Petitioner's trial counsel was not ineffective for neglecting to request and preserve an Alibi Instruction?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Was the Pennsylvania State Court's ruling supported by the : evidence and free from legal error when it held that Petitioner's trial counsel was not ineffective for neglecting to request and preserve a Alibi Instruction? (Pa.SSJI Crim.3.11). | II. Was the Pennsylvania State Court's ruling supported by the evidence and free from legal error when it held that Petitioner's trial counsel was not ineffective for entering into stipulations with the Commonwealth, that Petitioner sent five letters, without first obtaining Petitioner's approval, when said stipulations were in contrast to Petitioner's defense and trial testimony? III. Was the Pennsylvania State Courts ruling supported by the evidence and free from legal error when it held that — . Petitioner's trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to conduct an on-the-record colloquy with Petitioner before , : agreeing to the stipulations regarding the five letters allegedly sent by Petitioner? | | | . | | |