whether the district court and court of appeals abused their discretion regarding title 42 asylum claims

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | 1 Pundit, ask rhe supreme Loutt did the District Couaré | and Coutl tt APPtals Abuse thétt destretio re gardiagy : Trite /@ 2 tris the Dirteat Courde Clearly errbtieatts ? 2 Plann atk the Siihreni CattréWas phe. LISSA atlrtf, (op lOP bed cliddment Whbatrecr GA 1k Sd wWhttt Ofer AASVONS COUld have heCA SOKEL) FEIN I TiS PL te 7 | 3. Laintilt te the SUP Litré wis tbe Litter? Latrt Vésurd of hPbeats la diphenh jncovet jo wiwch vohat TSraints did the Cuts C67 Satl 7) CONMEP “Platt Or k the Surreme Lotito Hake actor) 14 Plat LaIE Femninwing phe case batk fi Dtttch Critre: 9. The Pitt ghia reuterd an Oral NGI AIF Sake | PI0CE J Phe LIV CI, OF chars fice. Zl . "