Whether an inmate's placement on a top bunk after suffering injuries from a previous fall constitutes a constitutional violation

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED © Satty of an Inmetes physical Being a V2 latiS, ? | @ wad on ta mene ra herems WAL a con stHtoutlenal tO beona bottoa hunk b + 7 oD fed there /, }, on iS poten atop budk od left @ ” RLPIL LIAGY QA Con sditotlona( violation v CD Tamete Falls Fram a Tep Buak no F405 p16 ow ° (Stake, tothe 7° pba! LS Serkt back to the prison to Fd, Several 19Jurc/es fo Alec head), Meck Sholdel ax Lip ect anol fot back eo the Same Top bople Ae. er ch f even though he fac a bebHom bunk asp Sel Loom be oa atop bunk+te sty} tH, a ~~ Shoat violarkian ON IS Hak & conch bbebnal 6) TL en taormke, carl worst ba a pci san beacause he has QD beHom bunk Pess bob get 16 pet an a top benk enc) Molt there Lor Cevyera| moths condi Le. gets hoch ave aftes he gets hort hoe iS ot back oa, aA YP bunk oue Lt, t% DOr. on = 7 ie eS cou Call ( and his iy a ae Op J j Satty Zs Woosed a Con st itoliSne | Violetion® Covld cause mento destress ? rected)