Whether the federal government's prosecution of the petitioner violated the petitioner's constitutional rights

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED The fede boner fs led a lortrocar? 4 te Sheeme Court bad | 7 raf ecests ton of The Jawfer and volztons oF Hh cosh tional rie Ite , | and dstarmines hore ts Wt Toco 4, bend another fpr re veal | tet Hy axboss Homsales because Hore 1S let Place and Ma Nee | sewer! do | The his, asked The dud @ Sandra GilDe lamadetd \Valsatta Ch of be Since 1 was beng cooled. Go that fam Forced 4, Make Pleat oF qutl wet t, Recent avidence and Natts be quided H the crimes ina ist oft I ovenher 22 ,2010 Hat afhars in +he tee dveumaxts si 15 ¢ bal qa volation of Ho due focase established in law Ho duck a entad Ho He fg oF rer by est hin) ol Pleaedly am accused of serine) eld Sonat shag od ad tl if ee Hat Le i de a b wil Tob fra etn Inde Yale evdoce t, have the “edd, oO te seauth cameras Lbnttted +p He Courts br f Ie da 4, Gee Hat «| Was net a Feeearm and My bahar rehised 4; ask For He evidences Allow'n He i 4 etal ts ben enter’, He Second fanal of i and ag ef is ia Wa o November 22,2010 id a Sandra Gil de lamadr’d lab oe fe eo ode cy Ht Hh caetnahi? of no fo cheat was Lh and @ven So om acca. . the all aHon of cul bite Aecordin t al He documents ooat alon with d is iL. 15 avedent Hct ail He thet of hharte Fico havo ‘ele all 4, coast tittonal re ts an Not resolved Here i case r wozted digteo an Hat to lar? fi I sae lav i Rach Hh Ha Bal