HabeasCorpus
Did the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals violate Mr. Stone's Fourteenth-Amendment-right-to-Due-Process
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1) Did the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals violate Mr. Stone’s Fourteenth Amendment right to Due Process by: | a) affirming the district court's Denial of Mr. Stone’s application for Post-Conviction relief even though Mr. Stone had shown prima facie evidence of his Indian Status and the | locale of the alleged Crime? b) affirming the district court's decision to deny Mr. Stone’s application for Post-Conviction based on the erroneous legal analysis in State ex rel. Matloff v. Wallace, 2021 OK CR 21, . __P3d_? | 2) Whether Oklahoma courts may exercise criminal jurisdiction over a Choctaw Indian in violation of treaty provisions between the Choctaw Indians and the United States? | 3) Does U.S. Constitution Art. 1, Section 8, deny criminal jurisdiction to any State absent a | grant by Congress? | 4) Since the State of Oklahoma did not enact Public Law 83-280, how can the State exercise jurisdiction over Indian territory? “ii