Whether the District Court's refusal to review the legality of the petitioner's detention due to the government's failure to timely adjudicate his pending I-360 application violates due process

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | |Inconsistency mM Inkexprekakyen oF | mmigrakion low A Due Precesx Welakien On unlowseul ONESKE ON A pending \-36e application : ey Unlow Cust brccatimna WED CS ela petilrene wrth @ Baum who 1% a Vawe ARRU com AL Ditslice fabricakaen of imnugcakien crocs Chaimins Met: a pekiliener dees net howe Peveling GRD cakren with Board oC tmaigrabien or USCS wirich i wet ~xud’ Ss Distuick Cows Judge of New jensen Ee fuse to Beinew the Legals, of ee ChronmsaeS because Ditslice TAckly xehease The pekitienew When the Court Sida wefute fe seiew tee Vabeas application ne Ovex IZ months few A Wwrseng fu Changes . G: Teed Croce afGemed the deciswn ofthe deoick Corte Sudge becenwe ee Pctitamner and lis Decisven Wolates the chockxine && mectness af Stipwlakesd im Suprem Court Prewent cekexmination: “T Refusal for a ¥e ltaming few Inconsisténcy Wi to ck \ Min Sei Premios deciswn er See Mertress