Did the United Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit decide an important federal question in a way that conflicts with the relevant decisions of this Supreme Court of the United States?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Did The United Court of Appeals for The Fourth Circuit Decide an Important Federal Question in A Way That Conflicts with The Relevant Decisions of This Supreme Court Of The United States. That Writ of Mandamus Is Not the Appropriate Remedy to Raise Issues of Double Jeopardy, False Imprisonment, And Lack of Trial Court Jurisdiction to Impose Sentence? Did The United Court of Appeals for The Fourth Circuit Decide an Important Federal Question in A Way That Conflicts with The Relevant Decisions with Other U. S. Courts of Appeals. That Writ of Mandamus Is Not the Appropriate Remedy to Raise Issues of Double Jeopardy, False Imprisonment, And Lack of Trial Court Jurisdiction to Impose Sentence? Did The United Court of Appeals for The Fourth Circuit Decide an Important Federal Question in A Way That Conflicts with The Relevant Decisions with This Supreme Court Of The United States That Petitioner’s Exparte Motion For Immediate Release In Support Of His Writ Of Mandamus Is Not The Appropriate Remedy To Raise Issues Of Double Jeopardy, False Imprisonment, And Lack Of Trial Court Jurisdiction To Impose Sentence? | | |! |