No. 21-7276
Julio Rodriguez v. United States
Tags: certificate-of-appealability circuit-precedent civil-rights criminal-conviction criminal-procedure due-process federal-courts habeas-corpus harmless-error residual-clause standing unconstitutional-vagueness
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Securities
HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference:
2022-03-25
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a certificate of appealability can be issued despite controlling circuit authority to the contrary
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether a certificate of appealability can be issued despite controlling circuit authority to the contrary. 2. Whether a general verdict that was obtained in reliance on the unconstitutionally vague residual clause in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(B) may be sustained based on the reviewing court’s finding that the jury also relied on a valid basis to convict. i INTERESTED PARTIES Petitioner submits that there are no
Docket Entries
2022-03-28
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/25/2022.
2022-03-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-03-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 4, 2022)
Attorneys
Julio Rodriguez
Janice L. Bergmann — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Janice L. Bergmann — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent