No. 21-7277

Sadeen Jones v. Pennsylvania

Lower Court: Pennsylvania
Docketed: 2022-03-04
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: carpenter-v-united-states cell-site-location-information criminal-procedure fourth-amendment inevitable-discovery initial-illegal-search probable-cause search-and-seizure search-warrant warrant-requirement
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2022-04-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is this matter so identical to Carpenter v. United States that like that case, this Petition for WRIT OF CERTIORARI should be reviewed, and granted relief

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED : A. Is this matter so identical to Carpenter v. United States, 138. S. Ct. 2206 (2018)that like that case, this Petition for , WRIT OF CERTIORARI should be reviewed, and granted relief. B. A United States Supreme Court ruling requires a warrant for . obtaining Cell Site Location Information (CSLI). | C. The application for Petitioner's CSLI records was not the : equivalent of an application for a search warrant, and the Court | Order authorizing their release was.not the equivalent of a finding of probable cause. D. The Search Warrant CSLI records were not the product of "Inevitable discovery," but rather the product of the "Initial illegal Search." . | . \ . i FA . | /

Docket Entries

2022-05-02
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/29/2022.
2021-09-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 4, 2022)

Attorneys

Sadeen Jones
Sadeen Jones — Petitioner